How the West Was Lost


The political and economic advantages that lead people to seek asylum in the West are the result of territorial jurisdiction. Yet territorial jurisdictions can survive only if borders are controlled. Transnational legislation, acting together with the culture of repudiation, is therefore rapidly undermining the conditions that make Western freedoms durable. The effect of this on the politics of France and Holland is now evident to everyone. And when we find among the “asylum seekers” the vast majority of those Islamist cells that have grown up in London, Paris, and Hamburg, we begin to recognize just how much the political culture of the West is bent on a path of self-destruction.

–Roger Scruton

Anti-border Hypocrisy

no borders 3

Anti-border people take hypocrisy to new levels. They decry borders, but lock their cars, have security systems in their homes, insure their property, place their money in well-guarded banks, install anti-virus systems on their computers, and use passwords on their cellphones. They protect themselves with all kinds of borders. They block access to their accounts on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and Pinterest. They make use of high-security passwords for their online banking. Some of them live in gated communities with armed security guards.

I thought you guys were opposed to walls?

One high-profile internet entrepreneur recently blasted President Trump’s to plan to build a Mexico border wall. However, this young billionaire has shown himself to be very much in favor of a wall when it comes to his oceanfront property in Hawaii.

Another Hollywood celebrity and open borders advocate is reportedly moving his family out of England due to safety concerns following numerous Islamic-inspired terrorist attacks. He will be taking his wife and two young children to Studio City, California where he has a mansion protected by (wouldn’t you know it!) a nice, big wall.

The hypocrisy is nauseating.

Can Humanity Live Without Borders?


by Frank Furedi

Boundaries are necessary for the flourishing of humanity. Simply to reject them on account of their seemingly arbitrary character is an act of evasion. Western society’s estrangement from borders is not a progressive step forward – rather it expresses a crisis of nerve in relation to holding the line. Western society has embraced the evasive tactic of non-judgmentalism. Now it must relearn the value of making distinctions. It needs to overcome its reluctance to make judgments of value, and stop being afraid to hold the line. In this context, it is essential to reject the idea that borders between nations are simply an artificial prop, unworthy things designed merely to keep people out. Borders are essential for the maintenance of national sovereignty, which is so far the only foundation that humanity has discovered for the institutionalization of democratic accountability. Without borders, a citizen becomes a subject – subject to a power that cannot be realistically held to account.

–To read the rest of the article go to:

In Praise of Borders


by Peter Hitchens

Borders are a substitute used by less fortunate lands for the sea and the mountains behind which happier countries shelter. No great civilization has grown and endured except behind the shield of ocean, mountain, or desert.

How different Poland’s history would be if it had a few dozen miles of deep salt water between it and its neighbors. How much trouble might be saved if Israel were an island. Countries with cliffs and churning, white-flecked seas for borders tend not to be partitioned or carted off into captivity, especially if they have the sense to build navies.

It is considered impolite to mention it these days, but Britain’s defiance of Hitler in 1940 owed more to the Channel and the North Sea than it did to the RAF. Salt water was our ultimate weapon, and our sensible respect for it made us hesitate, to Stalin’s fury, to launch any invasion against Hitler’s coastline. D-Day was a very near thing, even with the vast resources, the careful preparation, the brilliant deception. If the weather forecasters had gotten it wrong, the invasion fleet would have been scattered and the Red Army would have liberated Paris sometime in 1946, before driving on to the English Channel to ponder the future. At least it would have stopped there . . .

If a country has no sea, it must come up with a substitute. And that substitute is the guarded border. As a safe Englishman, I have never resented or decried these odd and often expensive structures. I can quite see why people want them.

To read rest of article, go to: